In an age where digital giants like Google and Facebook dominate the advertising landscape, South Africa is at a critical juncture. Findings from a probe into market activities, released on Monday, 24 February 2025, by the South African Competition Commission has raised alarms about potential penalties for Google and Meta due to anti-competitive practices affecting local news media outlets.
The provisional report findings of South Africa’s Competition Commission points out that Google’s algorithm distorts competition between news media organisations insofar as it overrepresents global news media in South Africa for search and top stories and underrepresents local language and community media.
According to the report, Google could be required to pay up to R500 million ($27.29 million) a year in compensation to South African media outlets after the country’s competition watchdog found the tech giant guilty of anti-competitive practices, while Meta and X also face fines.
This scrutiny coincides with the National Treasury’s amend tax laws, which require digital companies to contribute fairly through value-added tax (VAT). This legislation, which came into effect on October 1, 2018, has the potential to generate an estimated R4.4 billion annually funds that could provide a much-needed lifeline to the struggling local media industry.
The explosive growth of digital advertising in South Africa is striking. According to PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC), revenue from digital platforms like Google and Facebook reached R46.7 billion by 2016, with projections suggesting that digital will account for R77.4 billion of the total entertainment and media revenue by 2021. This trend reflects a global shift where digital platforms increasingly capture advertising dollars, often at the expense of local media.
However, the challenge extends beyond mere competition; it encompasses the exploitation of tax loopholes. The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has consistently struggled to meet its revenue collection targets, partially due to the tax avoidance tactics employed by these multinational companies. PwC’s 2016 report underscored the missed opportunities for levying corporate income tax on foreign digital firms, raising urgent questions about the sustainability of local media amid such systemic inequities.
The introduction of VAT on goods and services purchased by local vendors from tech giants is a vital step toward leveling the playing field. By ensuring that companies like Google and Facebook contribute to the country’s tax revenues, South Africa can reclaim some of the financial resources lost to aggressive tax avoidance strategies.
This additional revenue could be strategically reinvested into the local media sector, which has been grappling with declining ad revenues and fierce digital competition. In a landscape where quality journalism is increasingly under threat, these funds could help sustain local news outlets, support investigative journalism, and nurture a diverse media ecosystem that reflects the concerns of South Africans.
South Africa’s actions are part of a broader global movement. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the European Union are actively working to close the loopholes that enable digital companies to minimise their tax liabilities. These initiatives underscore a worldwide recognition of the need for a fairer tax system one that holds digital giants accountable for the value they generate in the countries where they operate.
Facebook’s recent commitment to transitioning to a local selling structure adds an intriguing layer to this discussion. By recording advertising revenue through local offices instead of international headquarters, Facebook aims to enhance transparency and comply with local tax regulations. While this move is promising, its actual impact on the South African economy remains to be seen.

As South Africa embarks on this crucial legislative journey, it is essential to navigate the complexities of international tax regulations carefully. The intricate tax structures that digital giants have established, often spanning multiple jurisdictions, complicate enforcement efforts. However, with determination and collaboration among policymakers, tax authorities, and the media sector, South Africa can lay the groundwork for a more equitable tax system.
These proposed tax changes are not only about generating revenue; they also signify a broader commitment to supporting local media and ensuring that the digital economy benefits all South Africans. The success of this initiative could serve as a model for other nations facing similar challenges, reinforcing the idea that in a digital age, the responsibility to contribute to society must be shared by all.
In conclusion, South Africa’s plan to reform its tax laws is about more than just revenue generation; it aims to foster a sustainable media landscape that can thrive in the digital era. With the right policies in place, there is potential to revitalise local journalism and ensure a vibrant public discourse that serves the interests of all citizens.
- Andile April, Author and Communication Enthusiast